<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content strategy: as boring as it sounds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smyword.com/2009/09/content-sounds-boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smyword.com/2009/09/content-sounds-boring/</link>
	<description>Writing and content strategy for small businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 06:41:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the problem with content and democracy &#171; Baddit Blog</title>
		<link>http://smyword.com/2009/09/content-sounds-boring/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>On the problem with content and democracy &#171; Baddit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smyword.com/?p=331#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] being paid for. Worth reading in relation to this is Gabriel Smy&#8217;s blog post: &#8216;Content strategy: as boring as it sounds?&#8216; that asks if it would &#8220;help customers to value content more if we called it something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being paid for. Worth reading in relation to this is Gabriel Smy&#8217;s blog post: &#8216;Content strategy: as boring as it sounds?&#8216; that asks if it would &#8220;help customers to value content more if we called it something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://smyword.com/2009/09/content-sounds-boring/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smyword.com/?p=331#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I think Proposition Strategist is almost too sexy to be taken seriously ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Proposition Strategist is almost too sexy to be taken seriously &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kristen</title>
		<link>http://smyword.com/2009/09/content-sounds-boring/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smyword.com/?p=331#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I agree, &quot;content&quot; is boring (I&#039;m also a strategist/content strategist). I would take your argument one step further to say that, its not just organizing your project around the content (well, it is, but you don&#039;t have to say it that way). Its organizing your project around an INTENT or a PROPOSITION. We start any project by defining that, then hanging literally every aspect of execution off of that well-defined Intent Statement - from the way copy is written, the way messages are delivered through media and design, the structure, the development... everything. 
So, I&#039;m not sure if Intent or Proposition are that much more sexy than Content as far as words go, but they do seem to have a more lofty purpose for existing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, &#8220;content&#8221; is boring (I&#8217;m also a strategist/content strategist). I would take your argument one step further to say that, its not just organizing your project around the content (well, it is, but you don&#8217;t have to say it that way). Its organizing your project around an INTENT or a PROPOSITION. We start any project by defining that, then hanging literally every aspect of execution off of that well-defined Intent Statement &#8211; from the way copy is written, the way messages are delivered through media and design, the structure, the development&#8230; everything.<br />
So, I&#8217;m not sure if Intent or Proposition are that much more sexy than Content as far as words go, but they do seem to have a more lofty purpose for existing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

